<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should religion be left out of the domain of science?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/</link>
	<description>All Past was Future once and all Future will become Past. The Present is only an illusion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: narendra</title>
		<link>http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-15821</link>
		<dc:creator>narendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-15821</guid>
		<description>hi!wonderful post!!
just a thing pops up in my mind always on this regard!!&quot;what developmeny can you have at the cost of people&#039;s faith&quot;
calling RAM a superhero and all that is not a good sign!it shudnt happen in a country claimg to be the bggest secular country!!!
&quot;Condemn
none; if you can stretch out a helping hand, do so. If you cannot, fold your hands, bless your
brothers, and let them go their own way. Dragging down and condemning is not the way to
work. Never is work accomplished in that way.&quot;-Swami vivekananda
center is wrong now!!i dont want any parts of ramayana to  show that ram existed or the bridge is made by him...
its my faith and i dont want u to touch it(you refers to govnt...not you)
-narendra
(http://frozenwell.wordpress.com)bit of advertising</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi!wonderful post!!<br />
just a thing pops up in my mind always on this regard!!&#8221;what developmeny can you have at the cost of people&#8217;s faith&#8221;<br />
calling RAM a superhero and all that is not a good sign!it shudnt happen in a country claimg to be the bggest secular country!!!<br />
&#8220;Condemn<br />
none; if you can stretch out a helping hand, do so. If you cannot, fold your hands, bless your<br />
brothers, and let them go their own way. Dragging down and condemning is not the way to<br />
work. Never is work accomplished in that way.&#8221;-Swami vivekananda<br />
center is wrong now!!i dont want any parts of ramayana to  show that ram existed or the bridge is made by him&#8230;<br />
its my faith and i dont want u to touch it(you refers to govnt&#8230;not you)<br />
-narendra<br />
(<a href="http://frozenwell.wordpress.com)bit" rel="nofollow">http://frozenwell.wordpress.com)bit</a> of advertising</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinesh</title>
		<link>http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-15776</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-15776</guid>
		<description>Who ever assholes have the power to say anything against Shree Ram or the Ram Sethu, the Bajrang Dal or any group associated with it, please mention your contact numbers and addresses next time. So that these things can be discussed in Detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who ever assholes have the power to say anything against Shree Ram or the Ram Sethu, the Bajrang Dal or any group associated with it, please mention your contact numbers and addresses next time. So that these things can be discussed in Detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Partha</title>
		<link>http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-14437</link>
		<dc:creator>Partha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 08:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-14437</guid>
		<description>There are three things we talk about here, religion, philosophy, and science. And I keep wondering how people are willing to accept something provided it&#039;s proved scientifically. Is science not dependent on the fact that we humans seem to some how have placed just as much faith in the logic of science as we have in religion? And why should one look at the whole concept of God, God&#039;s existence from a scientific point of view at all? Aren&#039;t scientists being narrow minded when they refuse to look at the concept of God from any other point of view other than science? 

Just like science, I believe religion is a part of humans. Whether one chooses to accept any one of them is individual choice. There is a huge difference in religion and blind faith, that&#039;s the first thing we need to learn to discern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are three things we talk about here, religion, philosophy, and science. And I keep wondering how people are willing to accept something provided it&#8217;s proved scientifically. Is science not dependent on the fact that we humans seem to some how have placed just as much faith in the logic of science as we have in religion? And why should one look at the whole concept of God, God&#8217;s existence from a scientific point of view at all? Aren&#8217;t scientists being narrow minded when they refuse to look at the concept of God from any other point of view other than science? </p>
<p>Just like science, I believe religion is a part of humans. Whether one chooses to accept any one of them is individual choice. There is a huge difference in religion and blind faith, that&#8217;s the first thing we need to learn to discern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muthamizh</title>
		<link>http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-13536</link>
		<dc:creator>muthamizh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-13536</guid>
		<description>hi friend how r u ? your blog was so nice.............i do wanna have a link back from you.... my blog is http://www.coool-pics.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi friend how r u ? your blog was so nice&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.i do wanna have a link back from you&#8230;. my blog is <a href="http://www.coool-pics.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.coool-pics.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vigbert</title>
		<link>http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-13277</link>
		<dc:creator>vigbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-13277</guid>
		<description>hey! zzap ? etlunnave?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey! zzap ? etlunnave?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gurmeet</title>
		<link>http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-12725</link>
		<dc:creator>gurmeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-12725</guid>
		<description>Atlantean,
you are too optimistic about religion and science getting along with a little give and take.
 They are fundamentally opposed at root- the root of religion is faith and that of science is reason, polar opposites. It will always be one or the other and any coexistence will be and is uneasy and tense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atlantean,<br />
you are too optimistic about religion and science getting along with a little give and take.<br />
 They are fundamentally opposed at root- the root of religion is faith and that of science is reason, polar opposites. It will always be one or the other and any coexistence will be and is uneasy and tense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jagannadh gosala</title>
		<link>http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-12696</link>
		<dc:creator>jagannadh gosala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-12696</guid>
		<description>1)Science evolves. Theories can be disproved. Once rejected theories are some times being accepted at a latter stage. Then how can we ask science to certify riligion when the science itself is not a standard one? Today science may say some thing is non-sense. But after some years (may be 100 or 1000) the same non-sense may make sense. 
2)Dont generalize Hinduism. It has never been a religion. And there are actually no specific set of rules of conduct or some penal code for hindus.
You cant actually comment on hinduism as such. Hinduism in itself is a very diversified and complex thing. Its more a philosophy than a religion.
There are Advita, Dvita, Visistadvita and many more philosophies in hinduism and all of them are accepted and are bieng followed till date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1)Science evolves. Theories can be disproved. Once rejected theories are some times being accepted at a latter stage. Then how can we ask science to certify riligion when the science itself is not a standard one? Today science may say some thing is non-sense. But after some years (may be 100 or 1000) the same non-sense may make sense.<br />
2)Dont generalize Hinduism. It has never been a religion. And there are actually no specific set of rules of conduct or some penal code for hindus.<br />
You cant actually comment on hinduism as such. Hinduism in itself is a very diversified and complex thing. Its more a philosophy than a religion.<br />
There are Advita, Dvita, Visistadvita and many more philosophies in hinduism and all of them are accepted and are bieng followed till date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balaji</title>
		<link>http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-12617</link>
		<dc:creator>Balaji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlantean.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/should-religion-be-left-out-of-the-domain-of-science/#comment-12617</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Here’s a man who was an exceptional human being

just curious. what was exceptional about Ram? unless you want to claim that he was a reasonably okay person in barbarian times, &#039;exceptional&#039; is surely an exaggeration. To me today&#039;s average arun on the street has better morals than Ram supposedly had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Here’s a man who was an exceptional human being</p>
<p>just curious. what was exceptional about Ram? unless you want to claim that he was a reasonably okay person in barbarian times, &#8216;exceptional&#8217; is surely an exaggeration. To me today&#8217;s average arun on the street has better morals than Ram supposedly had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
