You are currently browsing the monthly archive for October, 2006.
PLEASE watch this video.
The Uttar Pradesh government’s relief cheques that are as low as Rs 3 have left these farmers checkmated – literally – for banks don’t encash cheques that are less than Rs 100.
[...]
This is what Munna will have to do to encash his cheque of Rs 35. He will have to spend Rs 50 to travel to the district headquarters, where the revenue officer is likely to charge him Rs 200 for accepting the cheque.
He will then have to put in another Rs 250 to open a bank account. Little wonder that Munna prefers to leave the ‘compensation’ cheque untouched.
[...]
The irony of the entire situation is that some of the Rs 3 cheques that were issued cost Rs 4 to print – which is more than the compensation amount.
A cheque of Rs. 3.00! THREE DAMN RUPEES of compensation! For WHAT!
One wonders who to pity at this time – the poor farmer who is the recipient of this pittance or the socialist government of the state of Uttar Pradesh which is bursting a two-kilometer long cracker to celebrate this Diwali.
This is so atrocious! For some reason, this isnt headlines. Some idiot who attacked Parliament and got death sentence is ALL OVER the papers, TV and blogs.
PLEASE forward this post. Do ONE productive thing this Deepavali, apart from bursting crackers and eating sweets. Just spread that article! Just show to people the levels to which our governments have stooped. Spread awareness.
Compensation of Rs. 3.00! My goodness, what next? 3 drops of water per head, packed in plastic bottles?
(This article was first published at desicritics.org)
Mohammad Afzal Guru helped facilitate the attack on the Indian Parliament on Dec. 13, 2001. He was caught, put to trial under due processes of law, he confessed and was sentenced to death by the highest court of the land. However, there are many who vehemently oppose Afzal’s death by hanging. Let us see what their arguments are:
He wasn’t given a fair trial. He wasnt given a good lawyer. His confession was forced.
That he wasn’t given a fair trial is based on the argument that he wasn’t given a good lawyer and his confession was forced i.e., he was tortured brutally into confession.
1. That he was tortured brutally is purely the personal opinion of his wife in an article in Kashmiri Times. This opinion is purportedly subscribed to by a majority of Kashmiris. Everybody is entitled to an opinion but that opinion need not be the truth.
2. In the article, Afzal’s wife writes
“The police have made him falsely confess before the media even before the trial started.”
In the same article, she writes
“All over India people have condemned the attack on Parliament. And I agree that it was a terrorist attack and must be condemned.”
According to her, her husband has “falsely confessed” meaning that Afzal is innocent but she contradicts herself in the line “I agree it was a terrorist attack.”
3. If indeed the STF tortured Afzal into confession and if Afzal is indeed innocent, then how come Afzal himself has never said he is innocent?
4. If indeed the STF tortured Afzal but Afzal isn’t innocent, how can that be a reason for clemency? If indeed the STF tortured Afzal, then the STF may be guilty of human rights violations. And if that is so, Afzal’s wife should use the judicial powers that she has, that she’s so obviously using to plead for clemency for her husbad, to establish the guilt of the STF personnel who tortured Afzal and get them punishment. But that is no reason for granting clemency to Afzal. All those who deserved to be punished must be punished – be it Afzal or the STF personnel who allegedly tortured her husband.
“I am not saying Afzal is innocent. It is just that he has not been given justice” – SAR Geelani.
1. He merely says Afzal wasnt given justice but doesnt go into the specifics of how justice was denied, if at all.
2. Geelani himself was part of the judicial process in which Afzal, Geelani and Shaukat Guru were sentenced to death. The same judicial process also freed Geelani of guilt. Then, the argument that there was no justice and that the process was unfair doesnt hold water. What is Geelani trying to say? If the judicial process to which he was party was unfair, is he trying to say that his acquittal was also unfair? If clemency is given to Afzal and his sentence is reduced to life imprisonment on the grounds that the judicial process was unfair, then Geelani must be apprehended and put through the judicial process again because it would’ve been established by then that the judicial process was unfair.
‘The Government must see that hanging does not become a stigma on the Indian democracy as everyone, cutting across political lines in Kashmir, was opposing the move. It will be a strategic move forward,” Geelani said.
Stressing that Afzal was not given a proper ‘defence’, Geelani said the real planners of the crime were scot free in Pakistan and the government was doing nothing about it. Afzal was a third level accused.
“The situation in Kashmir needs to be taken into account before deciding on what he had done,” he added.
1. Not everyone is opposing the move. Only a few are.
2. When Geelani himself concedes “I’m not saying Afzal is innocent,” the argument that “Afzal was not given a proper ‘defence’” is futile and irrelevant.
3. The real planners of the crime may be in Pakistan. The Indian state will make all efforts to get them to justice as well. But that Afzal is a “third level accused” is no reason for clemency for Afzal. There’s no third level or first level here. An attack against the Indian state remains an attack on the Indian state.
Nobody, neither the state nor society has the right to take away the life of an individual.
This is the age old human rights argument. If neither the state nor the society has the right to take away the life of an individual, then does the state have the right to use the hardearned tax money of its citizens to finance the entire life imprisonment term of a person who has openly shown that he hates this society and wishes to disintegrate it?
Afzal’s hanging will make him a martyr – which can be used by terrorists to create more terrorists.
I feel Afzals’ clemency will create more Bajrang Dal activists in India than terrorists. I feel it comes to choosing between the two – a few terrorists or thousands of Bajrang Dal activists.
Afzal’s clemency will also be used by terrorist hijackers to do another IC-814 and get him and a few more terrorists released.
Afzal’s hanging will lead to widespread violence and chaos in Kashmir.
That Afzal’s hanging will lead to violence and chaos is based on the assumption that there will be violence and chaos. There’s no way of knowing that things will indeed turn out that way.
I have assumptions to make as well. I assume (I emphasize… assume, not exhort) that clemency to Afzal will rattle the BJP, RSS, VHP and the Bajrang Dal. This may have two undesirable effects:
1. It may be used for recruiting thousands of activists by the hardline Hindu right wing parties.
2. Clemency to Afzal may lead to violence and chaos throughout India as well. The 150 million Muslims living in India might come under grave threat from Bajrang Dal activists who think the Indian state is doing gross injustice by giving clemency to Afzal just like the Kashmiri seperatists who think the Indian state is doing gross injustice by hanging Afzal to death. A pogrom may be organised to vent out the frustration of these groups and this might result in thousands of Muslims being slaughtered ala Godhra 2002 throughout India.
We have a choice to make – a few stones pelted and a few grenade attacks on security personnel in Srinagar or thousands of our Muslim brothers being killed in pogroms. (This is based on assumptions mind you. The same kind of assumption that is used to justify the chaos and violence that may erupt in Srinagar if Afzal is hanged or any terrorist attacks that might ensue.)
Since I have a heart and care for all my Muslim brothers with whom I share this country, I choose the former. I dont want clemency to be granted to Afzal as it may lead to the organised murder of Muslims in thousands.
Allah is merciful but he’s very strict against those who violate the human rights of others and Allah is harsh against those who kill innocent people whatever their objective may be – something that Mohammad Afzal did to the 9 security personnel he killed or helped to kill.
Afzal is fighting for an Azad Kashmir which will be governed by Islamic Law. According to Islamic Law, waging war against another human being amounts to waging war upon Allah and His Messenger since all creation is the property of Allah.
5:33 “The only reward for those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land. Such will be their degradation in the world, and in the Hereafter theirs will be an awful doom…”
Insh’allah, Afzal should get the right punishment as Allah sees it fit. Since we live in a modern democratic country in the 21st century, however, we should not crucify him or cut off his limbs. Death by hanging is a more humane punishment.
PS: Ridiculing the decision of the highest court of the land, the Supreme Court of India, amounts to contempt of court.
(If you think clemency to Afzal is a grossly incorrect act and there should be no revision of death penalty, you can register your protest by sending an automated e-letter to the President by participating in this online signature drive.)
… but a militant, according to the BBC that is.
Lashkar-e-Toiba is always mentioned as a militant group operating in Kashmir wherever there’s a reference to the term in BBC News or on the BBC website. This, even after tons of data is present that LeT is involved in many terrorist activities in India. The funnier thing is that the United States itself refers to the LeT as a terrorist group. Even funnier, the recent plan to hijack many airlines which was busted by UK security forces was organised by members with links to the LeT and the JuD.
In fact, most Western media groups refer to the LeT and a host of other terrorist organisations as militants fighting for freedom while the openly stated objective of the LeT, in fact, is to establish Islamic rule in all of South Asia i.e., make India into as Islamic state. How they intend to achieve that goal, we all know.
Of course, if the LeT attacks British or American or Spanish people, it’ll be soon dubbed as a terrorist organisation. For example, after the Mumbai 7/11 blasts, the BBC regarded it as an internal security problem – the same old “Kashmiri freedom fighters” funda. Scumbags who killed closed to 200 innocent people didnt deserve the word terrorist but militant. But remember New York 9/11, London 7/7 and Madrid 3/11 when the word terrorist was used so liberally?
Maybe the recent plane hijacking attempt should’ve become successful. Maybe then, the BBC and the rest of the Western media will realize the true nature of the LeT.
Let us fight evil!
Let us shine light into the darkest corners!
Let us celebrate the victory of good over evil!
Happy Dussera!
Time for some Gandhigiri as well 
By the way, yesterday completed a full one year of my stay in Delhi. I got down the train last year in the morning of Oct. 1. So, it’s an anniversary of sorts. It has been a very significant year in my life. I learnt a lot of things. Lots of change too. No party, however
Atlantean Thoughts is now a featured blog for the “Just Like That” tag at WordPress. 
Recent Comments